Try & try until you succeed – that has been the desperate desire & hope of UN. As such, the world should not anymore rely, dwell & wear itself out trying to reach an impossible agreement because carbon emission reduction is only a theory, more so an illusion that was based on a false (or perverted) science, thereby making the treaty legally invalid in the beginning (i.e., lex celebrationis in international law).
If nations submit to an agreement, it will sacrifice the livelihood & welfare of people, driving world’s economy to collapse. Production & consumption will naturally be reduced and lay-offs go with it. Sales will fall. World’s trade via exports & imports will be down. Stock exchange will surge, leading industries to bankruptcy & insolvency. Defaults on credits & mortgages increase. Nation’s GDP & tax collection will fall & deficit will rise. Then crimes will of course be rampant. On the other hand, without an agreement, the threat of global warming & climate change continues since O3 remains unrepaired. When disaster strikes, then all are in fear. Some will flee, be displaced & be killed. Huge destruction goes along with it too. And likewise, livelihood & economy will severely be affected. As a consequence, countries’ losses will rise. In either way, both choices will kill, deemed evils against mankind’s survival and these will destroy the principles of UN, particularly ECOSOC, responsible for economic, social & cultural affairs.
God answered in 2001 but the world did not listen for years thereafter. It trusted the perversion of science & oppression of people, in contempt of God’s way of creation. It depended on the authorities’ ill advices which were: “to prepare for natural disasters” and “to adapt & mitigate,” and therefore these negligence & ignorance will be the history of world’s guilt for these had caused greater damages, successive events of calamities & tragedies yearly.
Solution to combat global warming & climate change was offered on December 2, 2002 to UNEP, based in the Philippines, by the author Winston Kayanan. The author discovered that, in re-fertilizing the soil (particularly the 60% desertification in the world) via large-scale organic matter recycling, we can create photosynthesis (including chemosynthesis), unaffected by global warming to siphon massive CO2 and, in turn, release O2 in the same amount. This move via collective or unified action will render the traffic of trapped GHG to move & flow, simultaneously neutralizing other gases like CH4. It will cool climate & calm weather, repair earth’s O3 layer & transport water (its vapor by wind) to rebuild the glaciers back and thus solving the problem of WMO, most especially for UNEP & UNFCCC. In the process of re-fertilizing the soil, we could make it arable (from sand to loam to clay) thereby creating a man-made fertile soil, good & suitable for planting vegetation & trees. This will solve the problem of FAO, most especially for WFP with respect to food abundance & reliance against famine, malnutrition & starvation. If O2 will be continually & abundantly regenerated, it will improve earth’s environ, thereby strengthening the health & immune system of organisms (man including plants, birds, animals & marine life) to solve the problem of WHO, most especially for fighting AIDS & HIV, H1N1 and other epidemic. See! We can heal earth and make it breath naturally. And thus, we don’t need to oppress people by imposing emission commitments via killing transportation & industries because natural gases will revolve & circulate freely, i.e., CO2 emissions are taken by plants (as a food material) and O2 releases are taken by organisms (as a breath of life). This is in line with the author’s philosophy, “Be one or united with nature in order to preserve life.” So why do we have to oppose emissions when these will give benefits to the plant kingdom that would bring down excessive CO2 to 300 ppm or less? If you analyze Nostradamus’ prophesy, “In one night, trees that have long withered, will go green again,” what meaning will it best suit, carbon emission reduction or photosynthesis? By choosing photosynthesis, the world will consequently proceed to a thousand years of peace.
Kyoto Protocol had its fill of troubles, suffering misfortunes after misfortunes in a total of 15 deliberations. It has no wisdom in its words for it could & would never bear fruit. It does not please & appeal to nations because it has a false scale & false weight. This made UNEP’s earlier optimism to end up a disaster, a total failure. Wasn’t it Jesus Christ who said that a tree which does not bear fruit should be torn down? When a nation sensibly & justifiably opposes a treaty which is considered oppressive against people (as well as the economy), it makes her great – keeping democracy alive, and that should be the moral obligation of any government to the people which is ironically the moral lesson in Daniel’s vision (Philippine version, un-coded by the a
We should be preparing for the next ice age
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Vostok-ice-core-petit.png
http://www.iceagenow.com/Growing_Glaciers.htm
January 5th, 2010 at 2:55 pm
We should be preparing for the next ice age
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Vostok-ice-core-petit.png
http://www.iceagenow.com/Growing_Glaciers.htm
References :