“A single candle can light up an entire room, but no amount of darkness can suppress it.” Let’s turn on the lights, and watch the roaches scatter!
So here’s the NEW RULE:
being as:
Any group or system that is reliant on your contributions is thereby subservient to you.
It shall be that:
The ones in charge of that system shall have NO CLAIM TO PRIVACY WHATSOEVER.
Think about it, you can go as far as demanding satellite surveillance, gps trackers (for more significant institutions like government) anything… and hundreds of thousands will still compete for the job.
So the higher your demands, the higher your expectations, the better these leadership roles will be fulfilled by good honest people with noble intentions.
It sounds serious… but somethings should be taken seriously… for a healthy change.
(p.s. I’m not stupid, I know this idea threatens the livelihood of criminal syndicates around the world, and I’m well aware of the dangers involved in issuing this call… But I really believe that the vast majority of people, even among these criminal syndicates, would prefer a better world if they only believed it was really possible… to see it in their own lifetime… And I really have no choice but to just have faith in them.)
So have ya a thought to spare? Drop it in the comment box and let’s see what happens… =)
Duration : 0:4:53
[youtube uUZoZ4dD6p0]
July 29th, 2009 at 4:29 am
By investors, I …
By investors, I mean to include “tax-payers.” By systems of centralised power, I mean to include any system that is dependent on the contributions of multiple persons in any way exempting simple parallel exchanges, i.e. discrete sales/purchases of goods/services.
For example, if all of a business’s financial acquisitions are from direct sales, or membership fees, it is not a centralised power. If, however, it begins accepting investment dollars, it must now become subservient to its investors.
July 29th, 2009 at 4:29 am
How quickly can a …
How quickly can a common vision spread across the globe? With the gutenberg revolution v2.0, i.e. the internet, we’ve far surpassed even 6 degrees of separation.
Never has it been more possible for a vision of a brighter world to spark a world-wide enlightenment revolution like never seen before.
With the current state of technology paired with the information freedom available to us, never has it been so easy for us to turn the tables on these shadow governmental forces of tyranny.
-johnny
July 29th, 2009 at 4:29 am
If nothing were to …
If nothing were to change at all, except that the just a significant minority of the common people spread this philosophy, and demanded CIA level surveillance (whose infrastructure already exists) of their public officials–political, corporate or otherwise–the systems would immediately begin serving our interests, and the corrupting forces would flee from all the exposure like roaches at the flick of the light switch.
All this is already possible. Simply as soon as we know to want it.
July 29th, 2009 at 4:29 am
This isn’t a …
This isn’t a dichotomy, we’re dealing with a sliding scale. On one side is light and freedom on the other side is darkness and tyranny. We aim as a matter of priority to slide as far to the side of light as possible.
This correlation is my thesis:
Corruption will always be proportional to secrecy.
These positions of power are voluntary positions, thus there is no reason why we should not demand that the men in these most precarious positions live by the highest standards of our expectations
July 29th, 2009 at 4:29 am
“What do you think …
“What do you think causes ‘centralised power’ to do the ‘evil’ things they do?”
Regardless of the causes, secrecy is required to allow for evil.
If a man is being observed by a jury of a thousand of his peers, whose opinions determine the state of his livelihood, this psychological pressure alone will prevent petty profiteerism, and the man uming this role will work to impress his observers in a meaningful way.
Fame, popularity, and the love of his peers will hold value over monetary gain.
July 29th, 2009 at 4:29 am
“How would we …
“How would we always know for sure if centralised power was keeping secrets?”
You can’t. But you can enforce accountability as much as possible, which would guarantee that the system would operate as favorably as possible.
If the investors demand that the men at the helm of the centralised power live in complete open-observation, this alone will ensure that they will work to the best of their abilities to serve their observers–in other words, to impress their judges.
July 29th, 2009 at 4:29 am
interesting vids.. …
interesting vids.. question:
How would we always know for sure if centralised power was keeping secrets?
What do you think causes ‘centralised power’ to do the ‘evil’ things they do?
July 29th, 2009 at 4:29 am
We over expose …
We over expose their deceit as the beacon of darkness it is, with a much brighter, truer light. A clearer vision. Our truth shall be to their lies like fine chocolate is to Hershey’s.
July 29th, 2009 at 4:29 am
I should remind you …
I should remind you that, with the Gutenberg revolution, this information sparked the renaissance 300 years ago. And now with this modern Gutenberg Revolution 2.0 i.e. the internet, this information will do so again.
The people must be inspired to see the hope and the vision of a brighter world… to see that we are 300 million men strong, and our servants are only 535.
With faith comes will. We have them surrounded. We have them outflanked like a game of othello. we just don’t know it… yet
July 29th, 2009 at 4:29 am
Yeah, but I …
Yeah, but I honestly don’t see it happening. I see ruinous heaps and untold destruction. If we can’t see through the lies of these politicians, there’s no way they are going to see through the rhetoric of the Antichrist. If we are already deceived and perishing, from whence cometh help? “if they do these things in a green tree, what shall be done in the dry?” You’re right though, the towers of babble(and Babel)will come crashing down. I just don’t see us accomplishing this task, rather the rock.
July 29th, 2009 at 4:29 am
The common …
The common awareness of the multitude of good men of nature is the closest thing to the inescapable, omniscient, omnipresent, omnipotent divine judgment of God.
God sees, and is seen through the eyes of common men. Faith in mankind, not as servants of his own illusions, but as servants of the natural order, i.e. God is therefore faith in God, and faith in nature in the highest ideal.
I just uploaded this:
(So it may still be processing…)
watch?v=22dVx02LamY
But please tell me your thoughts
July 29th, 2009 at 4:29 am
The solution is as …
The solution is as Thomas Jefferson said, we “enlighten the people generally, and all forms of corruption shall vanish like dark spirits at the break of dawn.”
Have faith brother. If we each push just a little bit here, and a little bit there, their towers of babble will surely come crashing down. =)
July 29th, 2009 at 4:29 am
Men must be …
Men must be governed by God, or they will be ruled by tyrants.
And this is exactly what we are about to witness.
Our hope must be that men find God when they lose everything else. But this will be difficult, because you are right about the light. Mankind rejects it, and loves darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil.
July 29th, 2009 at 4:29 am
these are the …
these are the conclusions I have reached. And this is why we need to reject a humanist/deistic stance. Jesus says himself without me, you can do nothing.
and it says in Jeremiah, CURSED be the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm, and whose heart departeth from the LORD.
We weren’t meant to govern ourselves. We need to be governed by God.
July 29th, 2009 at 4:29 am
…but it doesn’t, …
…but it doesn’t, and it’s not just because of our lack of adherence to constitutional mandates etc…there’s nothing new under the sun. mankind keeps making the same mistakes even after the very clear warnings presented in the historical record….America the great experiment has failed…mankind’s failure time after time to govern himself should prove that he is not autonomous; that he is not capable of governing himself, nor will he ever be capable to do so…
July 29th, 2009 at 4:29 am
yeah, the entirety …
yeah, the entirety of the institutional order is corrupt. the few upstanding organizations left are being compromised on a daily basis.
but i think consolidation of power is relative…if we are looking at it solely from a humanist perspective, there should definately be transparency. like you guys said in a previous vid, this system(the one we are supposed to have, ie. a constitutional republic with checks and balances etc.) should technically work…